Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Collegium System

Sat, Dec 29, 18, 19:43, 6 Years ago
star star star star star
4 out of 5 with 5 ratings
comments: 3 - hits: 8617
The Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President under Article 124 (2) of the Constitution while Judges of the High Courts are appointed by the President under Article 217 (1) and 224 (1) of the Constitution.

The Judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the President under Article 124 (2) of the Constitution while Judges of the High Courts are appointed by the President under Article 217 (1) and 224 (1) of the Constitution. Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts are appointed as per the procedure laid down in the Memorandum of Procedure prepared in 1998 pursuant to the Supreme Court Judgment of October, 6th, 1993 (second judges case) read with the advisory opinion of October, 28th, 1998 (third judges case). The word "Collegium" is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution. It has come into force as per Judicial pronouncements.

As per the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP), initiation of proposal for appointment of Judges in the Supreme Court vests with the Chief Justice of India, while initiation of proposal for appointment of Judges of the High Courts vests with the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court. Sometimes some of the names recommended by the High Court Collegium for appointment as Judges of High Courts are relatives of the sitting or retired Judges of Supreme Court and High Courts.

The Government on its own cannot recommend any name for appointment as a Judge of Supreme Court and High Courts. However, if the Chief Minister desires to recommend the name of any person for appointment as a Judge of High Court, he/she should forward the same to the Chief Justice for his consideration. The names of the recomendees are considered by the State Constitutional Authorities, Supreme Court Collegium and Constitutional Authorities at the Centre before their appointment as Judges of High Courts.

In order to change the Collegium system of appointments of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts and to make it more broad-based and transparent, the Government brought into force the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 and the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 w.e.f. 13.04.2015. However, both the Acts were challenged in the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court vide Judgment dated 16.10.2015 declared both the Acts as unconstitutional and void. The Collegium system as existing prior to the enforcement of the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 was declared to be operative.

Subsequently, the Supreme Court vide order dated 16.12.2015 directed the Government to finalize the existing MoP by supplementing it in consultation with the Supreme Court Collegium taking into consideration eligibility criteria, transparency, establishment of secretariat and mechanism to deal with complaints.

As the process of finalizing the supplementation of the existing MoP was likely to take some time, at the initiative of the Government, the matter of continuing the appointment process was taken up with the Supreme Court and appointments of Judges of Supreme Courts and High Courts are being made as per the existing MoP.

The qualifications for appointment of Judges in the High Courts are provided in Article 217 (2) of the Constitution. There is no examination either for Advocates or Judicial Officers for appointment as Judges in the High Courts. The appointment of Judges in the High Courts is divided in the ratio of 2:1 between Bar and Judicial Service.

The Advocates are considered for appointment as Judges of High Courts based on their professional competence, net average professional income for last 5 years, age, reported judgments in which he/she has argued independently during last 5 years and other relevant factors.
 

Process and Functioning of Collegium

Filling up of vacancies in the High Courts is a continuous and collaborative process of the Judiciary and Executive involving various Constitutional Authorities. Hence, the precise time frame for filling up the post of Judges of Supreme Court and High Courts cannot be indicated.

No recommendations of the Supreme Court Collegium for the year 2014 is pending with the Government of India. For the year 2015, the Supreme Court Collegium has conveyed on 1st August, 2018 for remitting two names recommended by the Allahabad High Court back to the Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court.

The Collegium System of appointment of Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts ceased to exist consequent upon the coming into force of the Constitution (Ninety-Ninth Amendment) Act, 2014 and the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, 2014 w.e.f. 13.04.2015. The Constitution validity of both the Acts was challenged in the Supreme Court. During the period when the relevant case was pending, only those Additional Judges whose terms were expiring were given extension of service.

The Supreme Court of India vide order dated 16.10.2015 struck down both the Acts as unconstitutional and void and the Collegium System as existing prior to the enforcement of both the Acts was declared to be operative.

Subsequently, the Supreme Court of India vide order dated 16.12.2015 regarding improvement in the “Collegium System”, directed the Government to finalize the existing Memorandum of Procedure (MoP)by supplementing it in consultation with the Supreme Court Collegium, taking into consideration factors such as eligibility criteria, transparency, establishment of secretariat and mechanism to deal with complaints.

As the process of finalizing the supplementation of the existing Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) was likely to take some time, at the initiative of the Government, the matter of continuing the appointment process was taken up with Supreme Court, and appointments of Judges in the Supreme Court and the High Courts are being made in accordance with the existing MoP.
 

The details of the appointments made in the Supreme Court and High Courts are given below

Position on Appointments in Supreme Court and High Courts
  2016 2017 2018
Judges appointed in the Supreme Court 04 05 04
Appointment of Chief Justices 14 08 15
Judges appointed in the High Courts 126 115 36
Additional Judges made Permanent in High Courts 131 31 70

At present, 143 names recommended by the High Court Collegium have been submitted and pending with the Supreme Court Collegium. Further, 5 names recommended by Supreme Court Collegium have been referred back by the Government to Supreme Court for reconsideration and 27 proposals including those names reiterated by Supreme Court Collegium are under various stages of processing with the Government, as per the procedure prescribed in the MoP.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Adv.T Choudhury
Member since May 1, 2018
Location: India
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
In the wake of the Partition Assam lost one of her districts to Pakistan. Mountbatten’s partition-plan announced on 3 June 1947, provided inter-alia for a referendum to be held in the Sylhet district of Assam
It is reassuring that while the Cricket World Cup is being played in the subcontinent, the organizers have wisely chosen to skirt Pakistan.
Law is a form of Social Science. Society and law are closely related to each other. Law tells the nature to live the social life and this also increases with the Economic, Scientific and Technological progress.
In a democratic country like India, judiciary plays a vital role in establishing a state of justice. Justice is desired by each and every person on this earth.
Our Indian Society consist of a variety of people that differ in Cast, Religion, Economic status and Gender. For this society a different kind of Social Justice required.
some Bizarre laws prevailing in various countries have been mentioned here
In Sweden it is illegal to use the services of a prostitute. Prostitution is legal though.
In the case of Dr Bhupal Singh Bhakuni v State of Uttarakhand & others in Writ petition (PIL) No. 127 of 2014 ordered the State to establish a National Law University (NLU) in Uttarakhand within three months.
Selecting and recruiting human resources for Public Administration is a management area that has been undergoing in – depth changes. An effective response is required to meet the challenges of a society in which growing knowledge and awareness of citizenship demand transparency and speediness of processes.
It is fast becoming a regular phenomenon in Kashmir Valley! These stone pelters who gather in large numbers and then without any provocation start pelting stones at soldiers who are engaged in operations with terrorists themselves behave like terrorists and like terrorists are responsible for inviting death.
It is a matter of utmost concern that in our country Centre is spending money like water on the security expenditure of separatists Hurriyat leaders but is not ready to spend even a small amount on the soldiers who are based properly in Jammu and Kashmir making them soft targets of terrorists
It is extremely appalling to see that Centre right from independence in 1947 till now has outrightly favoured Eastern UP in giving it a single bench of high court in Lucknow
To begin with, it is deeply disgusting, shocking and frustrating to see that BJP which is holding the helm of affairs in Centre as well as in State of UP is not listening to the repeated legitimate demand of its own MPs both in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha
Madhya Pradesh High Court in Praveen Pandey vs Madhya Pradeshhas issued significant directives against the call of a strike by State Bar Council and Bar Associations, including debarring members/officials of the Bar Council/Association which gives a call for a strike, from appearing before the courts.
Non-residents of India can join the Indian administrative cadre by cracking through the UPSC exams. They are the residents of India who are temporarily off from their native land. They should meet the requisite criteria for the IAS.
the change of guard in the Supreme Court with outgoing CJI Dipak Mishra passing the baton of CJI to Ranjan Gogoi might lead to a discernible change in the court proceedings as was evident right from the first day as the CJI made it clear that he will continue to be "strict and perfectionist" in dealing with cases and judicial administration.
It is most astonishing, appalling and ashaming to note that in spite of UP being the rape and crime capital of India as was rightly slammed by none other than former UN Secretary General Ban ki moon while he was UN Secretary Gene
The Biological Diversity Act, 2002 is aimed towards conservation of biological diversity, sustainable use of its components, and fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of the use of biological resource and associated traditional knowledge.
It has be said with deep dismay, utmost dejection and utter disappointment that this NDA government which came to power after categorically and convincingly promising the more than 9 crore people of West UP
This paper discusses the need to include the acts of aggression committed by the Violent Non-State Actors in the definition of Crimes of Aggression as given in Article 8 bis of the Rome Statute.
Quashed resoundingly a government resolution imposing a condition that the Assistant Public Prosecutor, whose rate of conviction is less than 25% of the cases handled by him, is not entitled to promotion and thus accepted the contention of the petitioners as valid.
What is happening in West UP? Who is safe in West UP when police officers are themselves not safe here and can be murdered so openly and brazenly as we saw for ourselves just recently in Bulnadshahr?
TOEFL is an English language test for evaluating the command and understanding of the non-native English speakers. The NRI education consultants suggest registring at least 4 to 5 months before the examination.
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan University & Another v. UOI imposed a whooping penalty of Rs 5 crore on a medical college for playing fraud on it. It also ordered prosecution of its dean.
the Advocates Act never intended to confer the disciplinary powers upon the High Court or Supreme Court except to the extent dealing with an appeal under Section 38 of the Act.
Nandu @ Gandharva Singh Vs. Ratiram Yadavcame down heavily on a lawyer for seeking repeated adjournments stated that seeking adjournment for no reason by lawyers amounts to professional misconduct..
Lucknow University Vandalism v/s UP guidelines were formulated by a Committee appointed by the Allahabad High Court on July 6. It will remain in effect until the state government and all government-aided universities frame the necessary rules and regulations to ensure a congenial and conducive environment for academic pursuits
Between 2014 to 2019 never Before has India's Image received such a Gigantic Blow from Being a nation of accepting new ideas and Embracing all faiths and beliefs to that of shutting down and shunting away anything that isn't acceptable to the ruling class ideology.
Usha Kanta Das and Amiya Kanti Das V/s S.M. Sefalika Ash, the Calcutta High Court held that only advocates enrolled under the Advocates Act are authorized to plead and argue on behalf of litigants before a court of law. Those who are not so enrolled cannot plead and argue on behalf of litigants before a court of law!
Why is it that only Eastern UP has high court at Allahabad and a single bench at Lucknow and all the other regions like Western UP, Bundelkhand and Purvanchal etc
How long will Centre like a shameless mute spectator just keep watching the law and order situation in West UP from turning more and more lawless? How long will Centre overlook the repeated murder of lawyers in West UP?
How long did Jawaharlal Nehru take to create a high court bench at Lucknow on July 1, 1948? Less than a year! How long will Centre take to create a high court bench in West UP
President of the Youth Bar Association of India The petition alleges that the fundamental rights of the citizens under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution have been violated by denying them the right to speedy justice due to non-appointment of Judges in Courts.
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of Pakistan
Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasads Reply on Lack of maintenance of Indian Courts and Courtrooms
Jadhav Case that Pakistan violated Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963 by not informing Kulbhushan Jadhav without delay of his rights under Article 36(1)(b) to have consular access.
A vision for the education system in India- has been crafted to ensure that it touches the life of each and every citizen, consistent with their ability to contribute to many growing developmental imperatives of this country on the one hand, and towards creating a just and equitable society
The transcript defines a recognized document, validated by the registrar of the university. It is also called a consolidated marksheet, published in the official paper and also attested by the dean or registrar. It is a payable service, generally sought for taking admission in the foreign university or employment abroad.
The certificate attestation is a compulsory practice if any non-resident wants to scale his business abroad. Mainly, any business is proved authentic through the Memorandum of Association (MOA), Articles of Association (AOA), Incorporation Letter and the Board Resolution.
legal giant named Ram Jethmalani finally passed away at the age of 95 just short by 6 days ahead of his 96th birthday on 14 September on 8 September after suffering from prolonged illness.
The Tamil Nadu Dr Ambedkar Law University Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, was directed to supply the copies of answer-sheets sought by the Respondent-students under the RTI Act.
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde to take over from the incumbent Chief Justice of India (CJI) – Justice Ranjan Gogoi on November 18 just a day after Justice Gogoi retires as CJI on November 17.
violence that broke loose at Tis Hazari court on November 2 between lawyers and police which left many injured, the Delhi High Court without wasting any time on November 3 very rightly constituted a judicial committee
BJP and Opposition parties like BSP are repeatedly raising the legitimate and compelling demand for the creation of a high court bench in West UP
UP Bar Council Chairman and senior advocate Harishankar Singh who has an impeccable track record has openly not just espoused the creation of a high court bench in West UP at any cost but has also simultaneously warned that if Centre and UP state government do not pay attention to it there will be a very big movement
to promote our foreign policy since the last Session of Parliament. In doing so, l focus on high-level visits that have taken place recently. ln order that their full significance is properly appreciated, allow me, Mr. Chairman, to briefly share with the House the larger context in which they have been organized.
The Independence of India came with tragic communal violence engulfing the life of more than a million people amidst the demand of separate Pakistan and the threat of Direct Action. The demand of partition was finally met by Indian Independence Act,
Bengalis and Punjabis are two communities which suffered major loss during partition. The evil plan to include entire Bengal in East Pakistan which was foiled by Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee and the volcanic outburst of Direct Action made Bengal a victim of Muslim League’s Islamist ideas.
arbitrary transfer of High Court Judges in our country is not stopping in our country at all which is hurting the smooth functioning of our judiciary immensely as some are even resigning in protest.
Top