Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Uttarakhand HC Directs State To Seal Hospitals Not Adhering To Clinical Establishment Act

Posted in: Health Care Law
Mon, Aug 27, 18, 18:33, 6 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 5311
Ahmad Nabi v State of Uttarakhand Uttarakhand High Court has passed several directions to the state government and hospitals/clinical establishments in the state to strictly adhere to the Clinical Establishment (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010.

It has to be said with immense satisfaction that in a landmark judgment with far reaching consequences, the Uttarakhand High Court in Ahmad Nabi v State of Uttarakhand and others in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 120 of 2016 delivered on August 14, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court has passed several directions to the state government and hospitals/clinical establishments in the state to strictly adhere to the Clinical Establishment (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010. The Division Bench of Acting Chief Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Manoj Tiwari passed several directions in a petition that was filed by Ahmad Nabi who among other things also pointed out how many hospitals and clinical establishments were not complying with the said Act.

Case Background
Before proceeding ahead, let us first jog our memory a little back to fully analyse and understand the intricacies involved in this case. The petitioner initially filed a complaint pertaining to two hospitals namely BD Hospital Doraha Bazpur and Public Hospital Sarkari Road Kela Khera, district Udham Singh Nagar. In the complaint, Nabi alleged that the two hospitals were being run by persons without having any medical degree and without any registration under the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulations) Act, 2010.
To be sure, he also further stated that operations were being conducted by the persons having no medical degree in surgery. Thereafter, the Chief Medical Officer issued two notices to the said hospitals in March 2016. An enquiry was conducted and a report was filed.

As it turned out, it was found that 10 patients were admitted for surgery in BD Hospital, Doraha Bazpur, however, no doctor having an MBBS degree was found to be practicing in the hospital. Thus, the two hospitals were sealed. The court noted that the State had given a provisional registration to these two hospitals on the basis of two doctors having a degree.

As things stood, while one had a degree in BHMS (Homeopathic Medicine) and BUMS (Unani Medicine). The petitioner, therefore, contended that the State has not adhered to the Uttarakhand Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Rules, 2013 as well as the Operational Guidelines for Clinical Establishment Act and Clinical Establishment Act Standard for Hospital (Levels 1A & 1B). The state government in its affidavit stated that necessary instructions have already been issued by the Chief Medical Officer to medical officers in respective territories.

Going forward, the state also sought to explain the non-compliance of Clinical Establishments (Registrations and Regulation). The court was informed that the Indian Medical Association had requested to the authorities concerned to keep the provisions of clinical establishment in abeyance, as the expenditure of the patient would increase five times. Thus, the District Magistrate, Nainital, had requested the Secretary, Medical to the State of Uttarakhand, to keep the registration pending till the matter is reviewed.

Final Order
Needless to say, the court clearly and convincingly stated that, "Once the enactment has been made, it must be implemented/carried out in letter and spirit." The court further recorded its utter surprise at the irrefutable fact that surgeries were being performed by people with no degree! This is terrible! The life and safety of many patients are put in jeopardy due to all this!

It goes without saying that the life and safety of patients is supreme! Para 37 of this landmark judgment mentions categorically and convincingly that, "Right to life includes medical facilities to be provided by duly qualified doctors with latest equipments. The patients in the private hospitals should not be overcharged. They should get the medicines at the lowest rates. The rates of diagnostic tests and other tests shall be reasonable and not exorbitant."

Truth be told, the court also held in para 36 of this landmark judgment that, "It is not believable that the surgeries in the hospitals i.e. B.D. Hospital, Doraha, Bazpur and Public Hospital, Sarkari Road, Kela Khera, District Udham Singh Nagaar are performed by doctors having B.H.M.S. (Homeopathic medicine degree) and B.U.M.S. (Unani Medicine Degree). The surgery is very serious procedure and it can be performed only by duly qualified surgeon. In a hospital, in which, there was no surgeon, ten patients were found to be admitted for surgery." Moving ahead, para 38 further goes on to say that, "It is better to have no law than not to enforce it. The State Government cannot be permitted to keep the enforcement of the Act at abeyance. The State Government has also adopted the Clinical Establishment Act Standard for Hospital (Level 1A & 1B), Standard No.CEA/Hospital 001." According to the said standard, every aspect of such clinical establishments has been looked into. The court reiterated those standards set in terms of medical infrastructure and other infrastructure that are mandatory.

Simply put, para 39 elaborates on with what all hospitals should be equipped. It points out that, "According to the Clinical Establishment Act Standard for Hospital (Level 1A & 1B), Standard No. CEA/Hospital – 001, there is categorization of hospitals providing minimum standards for Allopathic hospitals under Clinical Establishment Act, 2010. According to it, the building shall have a board displaying the name of the hospital at a prominent location. The name of the care provider with registration number is required to be displayed. The access of the hospital shall be comfortable for the patient and/or attendants/visitors. There shall be signage for "No Smoking" at prominent places. The access shall be provided within the requirements of "Persons With Disabilities Act". The hospital shall be developed and maintained to provide safe, clean and hygienic environment. The hospital should have clean public toilet(s). The minimum space shall be required as per Annexure 1. The indicative list of furniture and fixtures shall be required as per Annexure 2. The hospital should have adequate medical equipment and instruments, commensurate to the scope of service and number of beds. There shall be established system for maintenance of critical equipment. Equipment shall be kept in good working condition through a process of periodic inspection, cleaning and maintenance.

The list of medical equipment and instruments is to be provided as per Annexure 3. The hospital should have adequate drugs, medical devices and consumables commensurate to its scope of services and number of beds. Emergency drugs and consumables shall be available at all times. The drug storage shall be in a clean, well lit, and safe environment. The hospital is required to have qualified/trained medical and nursing staff. The support/paramedical staff shall be qualified and trained. The personal record of qualified doctors/paramedical staff is required to be maintained. There should be segregation, collection, transportation, storage and disposal of general waste, as per law. The Medical Records is required to be maintained in physical and digital format. The hospital is required to maintain confidentiality, security and integrity of records. The hospital is required to register all patients. The patient is required to be guided and informed about the Patients' Rights & Responsibilities.

The billing shall be done as per the Hospital tariff list. Each patient is required to undergo an initial assessment by qualified/trained personnel. Further management of patient shall be done by a registered medical practitioner. The patient and family shall be treated with dignity, courtesy and politeness. The prescription shall include name of the patient, date, name of medication, dosage, route, frequency, duration, name, signature and registration number of the medical practitioner in legible writing. The distance between beds shall be 1.0 metres. The door width shall be 1.2 metres. The labour room shall contain facilities for medication, hand washing, charting and storage for supplied and equipment. The labour room shall be equipped with oxygen and suction."

Finally and most importantly, in the concluding part of the judgment, para 40 of this landmark judgment goes on to point out that, "Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by issuing following mandatory directions: -
A. The state of Uttarakhand is directed to seal all the clinical establishments which are not registered under the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 forthwith.

B. The state government is directed to ensure that all the clinical establishments registered under the said Act follow the Operational Guidelines for Clinical Establishments Act as well as Clinical Establishment Act Standard for Hospital (Level 1A & 1B).

C. All the clinical establishments throughout the state of Uttarakhand are directed that the patients are not unnecessarily put to diagnostic tests. Only necessary diagnostic tests are ordered to be undertaken to access the clinical condition of the patient.

D. All the doctors throughout the state of Uttarakhand including government doctors and doctors serving in clinical establishments are ordered to prescribe only generic medicines which are readily available. No patient shall be forced to buy branded medicines.

E. The state government is directed to prescribe the rates for various diagnostic tests or procedures or surgeries or treatments extended by clinical establishments, within one month from today.

F. The outer wall of the Intensive Care Unit (one of its side) shall be fitted with transparent glass, closed with cloth curtains to enable the attendants of the patient to see the patient. The attendants of the patient shall be informed about the health/condition of the patient after every 12 hours and the same is ordered to be videographed."

All said and done, the ball is now in the court of the Uttarakhand State Government. The Division Bench of Uttarakhand High Court comprising of Acting Chief Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Manoj Tiwari has clearly and convincingly in a landmark judgment issued mandatory directions which must be complied with by Uttarakhand State Government. All such hospitals which are not complying with the Clinical Establishment Act must be sealed and necessary action must be taken against them!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Man is the only animal who believes in keeping order in his world. This was one of the reasons that he invented the concept of law
Dilemma with Euthanasia: Of all the rights, the right to one's life is the most valuable. Article 21 of the Constitution, therefore, makes it a fundamental right. Explaining the scope of the words life and liberty.
Writing a surrogacy contract is a complicated piece of Contract, and only experienced Advocate should attempt such a task.
Chandra Shekhar Joshi v State of Uttarakhand recently issued a slew of commendable directions for improving the functioning of Government Medical College, Haldwani and its associate hospitals.
The Government of India has enacted the Clinical Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Act, 2010 and notified Clinical Establishments (Central Government) Rules, 2012.
Common Cause Vs Union of India & Others, has “laid down the principles relating to the procedure for execution of Advance Directive and provided the guidelines to give effect to passive euthanasia in both circumstances
The surrogacy bill ensures regulation of surrogacy in India, prohibiting commercial surrogacy.
Baljinder Singh v Punjab and Ms. Khushi Khan v Punjab It is a no-brainer that these directions were certainly the crying need of the hour also and it is most heartening to note that we finally see them also being issued by a two Judge Bench of the Punjab and Haryana High Court which will help greatly in curbing drug abuse in the state.
This Summit is part ot the annual activities ot our Parliament in which we listen to our children and young people on what theirviews are about our works as public representatives. They choose their Presiding Otticers and run the Parliament on this day by themselves.
Anyone who suffers injuries in a road accident has the right to claim compensation for suffering and damages undergone.
In most cases, insurance companies are responsible for settling personal injury compensation claims, which involves a legal process best handled by personal injury lawyers.
Malik Ubaidullah vs Government of Punjab directed the Government of Pakistan and its agencies to desist forthwith from using the words like disabled, physically handicapped and mentally retarded for persons with different abilities.
When bitten by a dog, a small puppy or a big breed will injure you, leaving physical as well as mental scars. More so, if you see a child attacked by a dog and bitten, the experience is troubling and scary.
When we talk about domestic violence, one thing comes into the minds of most people. They picture a situation where an abusive man or wife hurts the other partner physically.
Women are most prone to sexual assault and rape globally, and it is one of the heinous crimes committed against women.
Swami Achyutanand Tirth vs UOI alarming level of milk adulteration in the country favoured stringent punishment for this offence and asked the Centre to consider amending the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Food Safety and Standards Act (FSSAI)
This article is about the medical negligence happening in our country during COVID 19
In digital healthcare programs information technology is used to provide the healthcare solutions to people who are undergoing treatment.
With an unprecedented load on medical infrastructure, many cases of medical negligence sprung up which have necessitated action to be taken by the Legislature or Judiciary.
Basic Rights of Food Security and its Outline in the Legal Field
Bhavneet Singh vs IRCON International Limited through Chairman and Managing Director that the Persons with Disabilities are not subjected to harassment by being transferred or posted at places where they cannot get an environment being conducive for their working.
S. Sahana Priyankaa v/s Tamil Nadu while taking a very grim view of the specialist doctors refusing to work in government hospitals has been most forthright in holding that the doctors after undergoing medical specialty courses
Sunayana Sibal v/s Government of NCT of Delhi issued a slew of landmark directions for maintaining proper hygiene in dairies in the national capital which is so imperative to ensure medical care of cattle kept therein and for use of spurious oxytocin.
Indian Medical Association v/s UOI that the fundamental right to health encompassed the right of a consumer to be made aware of the quality of products being offered for sale by manufacturers, service providers, advertisers and advertising agencies.
Ku. Shital Dinkar Bhagat vs Maharashtra that she took the extreme step under stress and thus her act is exempted from action owing to provisions of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017.
Top