Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

12 Year Old Girl's Rape And Murder: Constitute Permanent SITs In All Districts Within 48 Hours For Dealing With Sensitive Matters:

Posted in: Woman laws
Thu, Aug 23, 18, 12:35, 6 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 4520
Brutal Gang Rape and murder of a 12 years old girl in Uttarkashi v State of Uttarakhand The Court took cognizance of two reports published in newspaper

12 Year Old Girl's Rape And Murder: Constitute Permanent SITs In All Districts Within 48 Hours For Dealing With Sensitive Matters: Uttarakhand HC
It has to be stated right at the outset that in a significant development, the Uttarakhand High Court on August 21, 2018 in the landmark case titled "In the matter of Brutal Gang Rape and murder of a 12 years old girl in Uttarkashi v State of Uttarakhand & Another in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 102 of 2018 took suo motu cognizance of the rape and murder of a twelve-year-old girl in Uttarkashi. The Bench comprising Acting Chief Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Manoj K. Tiwari also appointed Advocates Sanjay Bhatt and lata Negi as the amicus curiae in the case to assist the court in this sensitive matter. The Court took cognizance of two reports published in 'The Times of India' dated 20.08.2018 which was titled "Uttarkashi rape: NH blocked for 10 hours" and "City residents march to demand death penalty for rapists of Uttarkashi girl". This news item has also appeared on 20.08.2018 in the daily editions of 'Dainik Jagran', 'Amar Ujala' and Hindustan (Hindi).

While craving for the exclusive indulgence of my esteemed readers, it must be informed here that the Bench directed the Registry to supply the paper book to the amicus curiae free of cost. Para 3 of this landmark order reveals that, "According to the news item, a twelve year old girl in District Uttarkashi was raped and murdered. The accused was not arrested by the Police. The residents of the area have demanded handing over of investigation to the Special Investigation Team (SIT) or Crime Branch Criminal Investigation Department (CBCID) and also to take action against the Police personnel under whose jurisdiction the crime took place."

For my esteemed readers exclusive indulgence, it must also be informed here that para 4 further goes on to reveal that, "It is also highlighted in the daily edition of 'The Times of India' that time has come to re-look into the land reforms by restricting outsiders from purchasing the agricultural land in Uttarakhand. There is a reference to Section-118 of Himanchal Land Reforms and Tenancy Act which restrict outsiders from buying land in the hill State. Residents of the area have also demanded to take stringent action against the culprits."

More importantly, the Bench of Uttarakhand High Court in para 5 of this landmark order sought to remind the State Government of Uttarakhand that, "This Court had already directed the State Government to consider amendments in the law for imposing death penalty upon persons convicted of rape upon minors. The State Government, till date, has not made its stand clear in the matter." Very rightly said! There can be no denying it!

Bluntly put: Can on earth there be anything more unfortunate than this? Why this dilly-dallying on the part of the State Government? Why no prompt action taken to check rape upon minors? Why State Government has not made its stand clear in the matter? Why State Government has not introduced mandatory death penalty for rape on minors? This is terrible! The Uttarakhand State Government must make its stand clear at least now on this key issue!

As it turned out, Paresh Tripathi who is the Chief Standing Counsel submitted that accused has been arrested yesterday and he will be produced before the Court within 24 hours. The Bench then very rightly noted in para 7 that, "We are of the considered view that the inquiry and investigation in these sensitive matters should be carried out by permanent Special Investigation Teams (SIT)." Needless to say, the setting up of SIT to investigate and inquire in such sensitive matters is a right step in the right direction!

Finally and most importantly, in its concluding part, the Bench of Uttarakhand High Court comprising of Acting Chief Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Manoj K Tiwari in this landmark order in para 8 summed up by saying that, "Accordingly, we issue the following mandatory directions: -

Permanent SITs within 48 hours
A. The Principal Secretary (Home) to the State of Uttarakhand is directed to constitute Special Investigation Teams in all the Districts of Uttarakhand within 48 hours, comprising of the following: -
a) Senior Superintendent of Police/Superintendent of Police.
b) Additional Superintendent of Police/Circle Officer (CO)/Inspector.
c) Inspector of Police (Woman).
d) Psychologist/Counsellor.
e) Woman Social Worker.

Handing over the case to a SIT
B. The present matter is ordered to be handed over to the Special Investigation Team, Uttarkashi immediately after consultation of Special Investigation Team, with a direction, to complete the inquiry and investigation in the matter within four weeks and thereafter, to submit the charge-sheet. Till then, the investigation is permitted to be carried out by the local police.

Speedy trial in all such cases
C. All the Trial Courts throughout State of Uttarakhand are directed to ensure speedy trial of cases registered under Section 376 I.P.C. as well as under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), by holding day to day trial.

State's response on land reforms
D. State Government is directed to file its response as to whether it is contemplating to prohibit outsiders from purchasing agricultural land in the State of Uttarakhand.

Protection to victims and their families

E. State Government is directed to provide protection to the victims and close family members of the victims in rape cases.

Prohibition against divulging victim's or family members identity

F. Social media is prohibited from divulging the name/identity of the victim and her family members, including their blurred pictures.

To be sure, the Bench then in para 9 ordered to list the matter on 31.08.2018. In its last para 10, the Bench then ordered that, "Let a certified copy of this order be supplied to learned counsel for the parties today itself, as per Rules." A lot more is to come when it comes up on 31 August! One has to concede in all fairness that there has to be zero tolerance for such heinous crimes like child rape and death penalty has to be strictly and swiftly implemented in all such cases!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Gender equality, also known as sexual equality, is the state of equal ease of access to resources and opportunities regardless of gender, including economic participation and decision-making; and the state of valuing different behaviors, aspirations and needs equally, regardless of gender.
Child sex ratio and right to life: The child sex ratio had deteriorated across the country over the last decade. In the Indian context there is a strong preference for son.
Facet relating to offences against women. The offences are of various types. They find mention in many enactments. These under- mentioned provisions are enumerated in Indian Penal Code, 1860:
The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 was brought into force by the Indian government from October 26, 2006.
For couples who cannot have children, a surrogate mother is a viable and increasingly popular option. A surrogate mother is a woman who has agreed to become pregnant in order to deliver a child specifically for a couple
Article 15(3) of Indian Constitution permits State to make any special provision in law for women as well as children.
Let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost pointing out that in a latest landmark judgment by the Bombay High Court titled Mr Ali Abbas Daruwala v/s Mrs Shehnaz Daruwala
Uttarakhand High Court in State of Uttarakhand v/s Karandeep Sharma, Razia, Raju in its landmark judgment delivered on January 5, 2018 recommended strongly the state government to enact in three months a suitable legislation for awarding death sentence to those found guilty of raping girls of 15 years or below.
It is most gratifying and satisfying to learn that from now onwards victims of online sexual abuse can report the same anonymously from their homes without bothering to run from pillar to post and pleading with police to lodge their report! The first-of-its-kind national sex offenders registry was launched on September 20.
Legal Implications of the #Metoo Movement and remedies under Indian law for the victims
Laws pertaining to online harassment abuse faced by women, and the the stringent measures taken by the Government to prevent online harassment/abuse of women with an insight to cyber-crime cell catering to women
The UDHR is a milestone document consisting of international human rights law based on the ideas of freedom, equality and dignity, a living text which is universal in scope and relevant to all individuals.
There are various property rights of women in India. This is a short study about them.
Delhi High Court in Anita Suresh vs. Union of India imposed Rs. 50,000 cost on a woman for false sexual harassment plea.
An over all view of Surrogacy Bill 2016
Punjab and Sind Bank and Others v/s Mrs Durgesh Kuwar have minced no words to make it abundantly clear that sexual harassment at the workplace is an affront to the fundamental rights of a woman.
The Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs Babita Puniya vs Lt Cdr Annie Nagaraja that serving women Short Service Commission Officers in Indian Navy were entitled to Permanent Commission at par with their male counterparts.
Scenario of Marital Rape in India - By Malvika Verma
This article relates to the Female Genital Mutilation that is being carried out in India.
The Author of this Article is Yashpriya Sahran. He is currently pursuing B.A. LL.B from Lloyd Law College, Greater Noida.
Reference v. Union of India asked Indian Railways to consider re-prioritising the lower berth allotment by giving the highest priority to pregnant women, then to senior citizens and thereafter to the VVIPs.
Nasiruddin Ali vs The State of Assam rape is a violation of victim's fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Mrs Justice Rumi Kumari Phukan of Gauhati High Court who authored this noteworthy judgment
Muhammad Abbas Vs The State in Jail Supreme Court of Pakistan observed that extremism and violence has permeated through Pakistani society and it has been brutalized. Not enough is done to ensure that crimes against women do not take place.
X vs State of Kerala Guidelines for maintaining rape victim's anonymity in the matters instituted before it. Justice PB Suresh Kumar who authored this recent, remarkable and righteous judgment while considering a petition arising out of a bail order passed by POCSO
Maheshwar Tigga vs Jharkhand have acquitted a man accused of raping a woman on the pretext of marriage. It observed that misconception of fact arising out of promise to marry has to be in proximity of time to the occurrence and cannot be spread over a long period of time coupled
Smt. Neeraj v. Rajasthan A female government servant is entitled to grant of maternity leave, irrespective of the fact that she had given birth to the child prior to her joining government service.
J & K v/s Md. Imran Khan while reminding the mandate of Section 228A of the J&K Ranbir Penal Code directed the Trial Courts of the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh to avoid disclosing identity of rape survivors in their proceedings and judgments.
marital rape an offence. A rape is a rape. A husband who is supposed to protect his wife and take care of her in all possible respects if himself starts raping his wife must be awarded the strictest punishment
Satish vs Maharashtra groping a child's breasts without skin-to-skin contact would amount to molestation under the Indian Penal Code but not the graver offence of sexual assault under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.
Sangita v/s Maharashtra has issued additional guidelines to restrain print/electronic media as well general public, using social media, from publishing information related to rape victim that could directly or indirectly disclose her identity.
Dr Sandeep Mourya vs State in Bail Appn granted anticipatory bail to a doctor based in Delhi accused of raping a woman on the pretext of false promise of marriage after observing that there was no forceful sexual assault done in the case.
The idea of marital rape has always been under a limelight when it came to the situations of India. The laws in India have extensively worked on rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse but have turned a dead eye to the concept of marital rape
A rape is a rape. Just because a man has married a woman that by itself does not confer the legitimate right to man to have sex with woman against her wish by forcing her in anyway.
huge surge in complaints by women of sexual harassment at workplace. As things stand, if strongest possible action is not taken against the culprits who dare to sexually harass a woman
fast-tracking rape trials, the Supreme Court has said that a rape victim should be taken directly to a Magistrate for recording her statements within 24 hours of the crime.
This article puts light on how a woman's life could have a positive impact if the marital age is revised.
Mohasina Mukhtar PhD Scholar Law, RIMT University,Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab
Monika vs HP there should be no restraint to a woman throughout the period of her pregnancy as restraints and confined spaces might cause mental stress to a pregnant woman.
Mahesha vs Malebennur Police Davanagerewhile displaying zero tolerance for crimes against humanity laid down in no uncertain terms
Aarti Sharma vs Ganga Saran provisions of Domestic Violence Act, being a social welfare legislation, cannot be used by a son as a ploy to either claim a right in his father's property or to retain possession of the same on the strength of his wife's right of residence
Rajkishore Shrivastava vs. MP that getting the consent of the prosecutrix to involve in a sexual act by making false promise of re-employment, can't be called 'free consent' and it would amount to consent obtained under a misconception of fact (as per Section 90 of IPC).
Guruvinder Singh v UP even if sexually explicit images and videos are captured with the consent of a woman, the misuse of the same can't be justified once the relationship between the victim and the accused gets strained.
Irappa Siddappa Murgannavar vs Karnataka the low age of the rape victim is not considered as the only or sufficient factor for imposing a death sentence.
Mamta Devi Vs UP Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow the rescue of a married woman who had moved the High Court with her protection plea claiming that she is facing threats from her family members
Kumari D v/s Karnataka has held most commendably that the right of a woman to exercise her reproductive choice is a dimension of personal liberty as understood under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and she has a sacrosanct right to have her bodily integrity protected.
Kashinath Narayan Gharat v/s Maharashtra that mere refusal to marry a woman after a long relationship would not constitute cheating under Section 417 of the IPC if there is no evidence of fraudulent misrepresentation of promise of marriage for sex.
Neha vs Vibhor Garg Recording of telephonic conversations of the wife without her knowledge amounts to infringement of her privacy and the transcripts of such conversations cannot be accepted as evidence by Family Courts.
Mirza Iqbal @ Golu v/s Uttar Pradesh quashed the criminal proceedings lodged for a dowry death and dowry demand against a man and a woman observing that the husband's family members are frequently named as accused in matrimonial disputes by making passing reference of them in the FIR.
Siddhivinayak Umesh Vindhe v/s Maharashtra asked the Maharashtra State Government to consider making offence punishable under Section 498A of IPC a compoundable offence. The Court also pointed out that Andhra Pradesh is already taking this approach.
Top