Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.

» Home
Thursday, November 21, 2024

Special Squad Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To Prevent Slaughter: Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions for Welfare of Cows and Other Stray Cattle

Posted in: Judgment Reviews
Wed, Aug 22, 18, 10:54, 6 Years ago
star star star star star
0 out of 5 with 0 ratings
comments: 2 - hits: 4993
Alim v State of Uttarakhand, The Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of directions for the welfare of cows and other stray cattle in the state.

Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To Prevent Slaughter: Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Welfare Of Cows And Other Stray Cattle
"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." - Mahatma Gandhi as quoted in para 76 of this landmark judgment

To begin with, in a landmark judgment titled Alim v State of Uttarakhand and others dated August 10, 2018, the Uttarakhand High Court issued a slew of directions for the welfare of cows and other stray cattle in the state. The landmark directions were issued by a Bench comprising Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari, on a petition filed by an individual named Alim who alleged rampant illegal slaughter of cows and other animals in his area. He had strongly contended that the State has utterly failed in its duty to enforce the provisions of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Municipal Laws and Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

To be sure, Justice Rajiv Sharma (Oral) pointed out at the outset in para 1 that, "The petitioner is a permanent resident of Village Sohalpur Gada, Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. The petitioner has sought direction to stop illegal activities of Respondent nos. 5 to 7 in the village. According to the averments made in the petition, the respondent 5 is brutally slaughtering cows in the village and the blood is flowing in the streets. Petitioner has placed on record the disturbing and moving picture of a cow being slaughtered in a very brutal manner, that too in an open space." Para 2 states that, "The respondent no. 2 had issued a license in favour of the respondent no. 5 on 24.04.2014, respondent no. 2 issued license in favour of respondent no. 5 for only selling meat. It was extended till 23.04.2015. Respondent no. 5 slaughters the cow during night time. The license issued in favour of respondent no. 5 had expired on 23.04.2016."

Going forward, in para 3 it is stated that, "The villagers had also lodged complaints with the Police Station Kotwali – Gangnahar, Roorkee District Haridwar on 05.07.2015. Special inspection was carried out in the village. The report was filed before the Senior Superintendent of Police, Haridwar, vide annexure no. 4." Para 4 minces no words in observing that, "It has come on record that private respondents have not obtained licenses to slaughter animals. They slaughter the animals in their houses and sell their meat."

Truth be told, the Court widened the scope of the petition, noting the deficiencies in adhering to the provisions of the existing laws by the State and the citizens alike. This landmark judgment highlighted the necessity to show compassion towards animals with the Court observing, "We have to show compassion towards all living creatures. Animals may be mute but we as a society have to speak on their behalf. No pain or agony should be caused to the animals. Cruelty to animals also causes psychological pain to them. In Hindu Mythology, every animal is associated with God. Animals breathe like us and have emotions. The animals require food, water, shelter, normal behaviour, medical care, self-determination."

As it turned out, the Bench then asserted that it was invoking the parens patriae doctrine to issue the following mandatory directions to the respondents in the welfare of the cows and other stray cattle: -

 

No slaughter of cow and stray cattle

A. No person in the State of Uttarakhand shall slaughter cause or cause to be slaughtered, or offer or cause to be offered for slaughter, any cow, bull, bullock, heifer or calf forthwith.

B. No person shall export cow, bull, bullock, heifer or calf for the purpose of slaughter either directly or through his agent or servant or any other person acting on his behalf if the same is likely to be slaughtered.

C. No person shall sell beef or beef products in any form throughout the State of Uttarakhand.

Prosecution against owners of stray cattle
D. Prosecution be launched under Section 289, 428 and 429 of the I.P.C. and also under various provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty of Animals Act, 1960 as well as Section 7 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, against the owners of any cattle which are found on the streets, roads and public places.

No stray cattle on the roads
E. Chief Engineers of all National Highways in the State of Uttarakhand and the State Highways are directed to ensure that no stray cattle, including cows and oxen come onto the roads.
F. Executive Officers of the Municipal Corporations, Municipal Bodies, Nagar Panchayats and Pradhans of the Gram Panchayats are directed to ensure that all the roads passing through their jurisdiction are kept free from the stray cattle to ensure free and smooth flow of the traffic.

G. The functionaries of the State are directed that while removing the stray cattle from the road, the utmost compassion is shown towards them and no unnecessary pain and suffering is inflicted on. In case the cattle are transported, in that eventuality there should be a provision for construction of ramps and the vehicles should be driven at speeds not more than 10-15 kms/hour to avoid injuries to the animals, being transported.


H. The Government Veterinary Officers/Doctors throughout the State of Uttarakhand are directed to treat all the stray cattle. The Executive Officers of the Municipal Bodies, Nagar Panchayats and all the Gram Panchayats are directed to ensure that the stray cattle suffering from any injury or disease are got treated from the Veterinary Hospitals in their respective jurisdictions. All the Veterinary Hospitals in the State of Uttarakhand are directed to provide necessary medical treatment to the cows and animals as and when brought before them. No Government Veterinary Officer/Doctor shall refuse to treat stray cattle brought before him by the authorities or any enlightened citizen. Every citizen has a right to bring to the notice of the Veterinary Officer/Doctor throughout the State of Uttarakhand the location of the cow or stray animal suffering from any disease or injury for its treatment.
 

Construction of Gaushalas

I. All the Municipal Corporation, Municipal Bodies including Zila Parishads are directed to construct in their respective jurisdiction "Gaushalas"/"gausadans" or shelters/homes for housing cow progeny and stray cattle within a period of one year from today.

J. All the District Magistrates throughout State of Uttarakhand are directed to construct Gaushalas/Gausadans in a cluster of 25 villages throughout the State of Uttarakhand within a period of one year from today.

K. The ‘Gaushalas’/gausadans’ or shelters should be constructed on scientific lines, taking into consideration the comfort of animals to be housed there. No commercial charges shall be levied for supplying the electricity and water connections in Gaushalas /Shelters.

L. The State Government is directed to appoint infirmaries within a period of three weeks in order to treat and take care of the animals as per Section 35 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

Special squad for protecting cows
M. The special squad is ordered to be headed by the Officer not below the rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police in both Commissionaries i.e. Kumaon and Garhwal with one Veterinary Doctor to protect cows.

No encroachers in Gaushalas
N. The State Government is directed to evict all the unauthorized occupants/encroachers from the Gaushalas/gausadans within a period of three months from today after granting opportunity of hearing to them.

Patrolling for ensuring that cows are not slaughtered
O. The Circle Officer of all the Districts throughout the State of Uttarakhand more particularly faslling in the plain areas are directed to patrol the rural areas once in 24 hours to ensure that no cow is slaughtered.

Religious gurus to help with construction of Gaushalas
P. All the Head Gurus of all the religions including Deras are requested to assist the State in construction of Gaushalas/gausadans to house cows.
 

Carrying of load by animals

Q. The State Government is directed to ensure that the draught animals do not carry load while driving vehicles more than as prescribed.

R. The State Government is directed to ensure that no animal shall carry weight or load in excess of the weight as prescribed.

S. It is also made clear that where the route by which a vehicle is to be drawn involves an ascent for not less than one kilometer and the gradient is more than three meters in a distance of thirty metres, the weight shall be half of what is specified by this Court. It is also made clear by way of abundant precaution that the weight specified in the direction made hereinabove, shall be inclusively the weight of the vehicle.

T. The State Government is directed to ensure that in any area where the temperature exceeds37°C (99°F) during the period between 11.00 am and 4.00 p.m. in summers and when the temperature is below 5°C between 5 a.m. to 7 a.m. and between 10 p.m. to 5 a.m. in winter season no person is permitted to keep or cause to be kept in harness any animal used for the purpose of drawing vehicles.

U. The State Government is directed to ensure that all the cattle i.e. cow, bulls, buffalos and calf are transported in goods vehicle as per Rule 56 of the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978 by providing special type of tail board on padding around the sides. The ordinary goods vehicle shall be provided with anti-slipping material such as coir matting or wooden boards on the floor and the superstructure. No goods vehicle shall carry more than six cattle. Each goods vehicle shall be provided with one attendant. The goods vehicle shall not be loaded with any other merchandise. The cattle should preferably face the engine to prevent them from being frightened or injured. The same instructions shall be followed by the Railways authority as per Rules 47-55 of the Transport of Animal Rules, 1978. The horses, mules and donkeys shall also be transported as per Rules, 57 to 63 of the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978. The sheep and goats shall be transported as per Rules 64 to 75 of the Transport of Animal Rules, 1978. The poultry shall be transported as per Chapter VII and the Rules 76 to 84 of the Transport of Animals Rules, 1978. The animals should be separated by means of wooden ballies or MS pipes in such a way not more than 6 cattle can be transported in the vehicle. A ramp should be fixed to the vehicle on the rear side which can be folded upwards and it should have a width of 1.5 meters and inclination of 30 degrees when it is landed on the ground. The ramp should take the weight of the animals. A First-Aid Box filled with the medicines, as provided under the Rules shall be carried in the vehicle transporting the animals.
 

Conditions for transporting animals on foot

V. No animal including cows, buffaloes, calves, horses, ponies, mules, donkeys, foal, goats and sheep, kids and lambs, pigs piglets shall be transported on foot beyond the period specified in Rule 12 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Transport of Animals on Foot) Rules, 2001.

W. The animals shall be transported on foot only when the temperature is between12°C to 30°C.The animals should be provided water every two hours and food in every four hours. The animals should not be made to walk more than 2 hours at a stretch.

X. The State Government is directed to ensure that every animal to be transported should be healthy and in good condition. A certificate of veterinary doctor in respect of each animal to be transported is made compulsory as per Rule 4 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Transport of Animals on Foot) Rules, 2001.

Y. No new born animal of which the navel has not completely healed, diseased, blind, emaciated, lame, fatigued, or having given birth during the preceding seventy-two hours or likely to give birth during transport are ordered not to be transported on foot. There should be watering arrangements en-route during transport of such animals on foot. There should be sufficient feed and fodder arrangements during transportation of animals.

Z. The animals while transported shall not be tied by its nose, or legs or any other part of the body except by its neck. The animals, if at all, are to be tied during transportation shall be tied with rope covered with suitable cushioning.

AA. The State Government is directed to ensure that no animals shall be transported on foot on hard cement, bitumen-coated or metalled roads, steep gradients or hilly and rocky terrain, irrespective of weather conditions (summer and winter), as per Rule 30 of the Rules of 2001. BB. All the police officers are directed to enforce the provisions of Rule 14.

Societies for prevention of cruelty on animals

CC. The State Government is also directed to constitute societies for prevention of cruelty to animals in each district, if not already constituted.
DD. The cost of transporting the animal to an infirmary or pinjrapole, shall be paid by the owner of the animal.

Registration of cases against those abandoning cows

EE. The State Government is directed to register cases against the persons who leave vagrant any cow progeny and free for wandering a cow after milching her.
In the ultimate analysis, it has to be said that this landmark judgment is a watershed development for ensuring that cows and other stray cattles are treated properly just like other living beings and not ill treated or slaughtered! It must be implemented in totality! Only then will it serve its true purpose! Just doing lip service on "Gau Mata" is futile unless all such steps are actually implemented in totality as have been outlined by the Bench of Justice Rajiv Sharma and Justice Manoj Kumar Tiwari of Uttarakhand High Court in this landmark judgment! The Bench also very rightly points out in para 71 of this landmark judgment that, "Their Lordships of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 2014(7) SCC 547, in the case of "Animal Welfare Board of India vs A. Nagaraja & others", have held that animal welfare laws have to be interpreted keeping in mind the welfare of animals and species best interest subject to just exception out of human necessity. Their Lordships have further held that there are internationally recognized freedom of animals as under: - (i) freedom from hunger, thirst and malnutrition; (ii) freedom from fear and distress; (iii) freedom from physical and thermal discomfort; (iv) freedom from pain, injury and disease; and (v) freedom to express normal patterns of behavior". This must be strictly ensured!

Sanjeev Sirohi, Advocate,
s/o Col BPS Sirohi,
A 82, Defence Enclave,
Sardhana Road, Kankerkhera,
Meerut – 250001, Uttar Pradesh.

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Sanjeev Sirohi Advocate
Member since Apr 20, 2018
Location: Meerut, UP
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Arun Kumar Bhadoria v State, Improve Working Conditions For Police And Ensure Minimum Three Promotions For All Cops
Senior Citizen Welfare Organization & Another v State of Uttarakhand & Another in Writ Petition (PIL) No. 52 of 2013 with far reaching consequences, the Uttarakhand High Court on June 12, 2018 has issued a slew of directions for welfare and protection of rights of senior citizens in the state.
in Arun Kumar v State of Uttarakhand and other [Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2112 of 2011] dated July 6, 2018 issued a slew of landmark directions to ensure that road safety is enhanced to the best possible extent.
It is a matter of deepest regret that both the Congress and the BJP which have ruled India from 1947 to 2018 fully and firmly support the unrestricted, unaccounted and undisclosed political donations to political parties from foreign countries.
Delhi High Court in Jasmeen Kaur v Union of India and others in W.P.(C) 7040/2018 while holding merit over technical grounds has opened up a closed opportunity for an aspiring medico to register for the second round of counselling for deemed universities after the due date. How can merit be defeated on technical ground?
What will the lawyers of West UP do on August 4? Strike like they do every Saturday since May 1981.
The State of Rajasthan v Mohan Lal, Minced no words in sending out a clear and categorical message to all courts below that courts must see that the public doesn’t lose confidence in the judicial system.
Chhitij Kishore Sharma v Mr Justice Lok Pal Singh while holding that contempt proceedings cannot be initiated against a Judge of Court of Record, on allegations of committing a contempt of his own Court has dismissed as not maintainable.
ection 377 of the IPC has been decriminalised partially by a Five Judge Constitution Bench of Supreme Court for sex between consenting adults on a batch of petitions filed.
In Mohammed Imran v Maharashtra has directed the state authorities to reconsider the candidature of a successful aspirant for judicial service, whose selection for appointment was cancelled on the ground of 'Moral Turpitude' and even high court had turned down his plea against cancellation.
many other UP Chief Ministers like ND Tiwari, Rajnath Singh and others too suported the demand for a high court bench in West UP but Centre never cooperated
Swapnil Tripathi v Supreme Court of India has clearly and convincingly held that the Court proceedings shall be live-streamed in the larger public interest.
dismissed the plea by Associated Journals Ltd (AJL), who are the publisher of National Herald newspaper and who challenged the Centre's order to vacate the premises
Adultery is the symptom of broken marriage and not the reason of broken marriage.
Anil Kumar v UOI that no authority can claim a privilege not to comply with its judgment.
Madras High Court has been very categorical in drawing a red line for itself on which it just cannot tread upon! Each and every Court in India must always bear this in mind while ruling in such sensitive and emotional cases
ICJ has held upfront that Pakistan violated the Vienna Convention in the Kulbhushan Jadhav case and it should review and reconsider his conviction and sentencing while allowing India consular access to the Indian national.
Lord Ram did not fight shy to even sacrifice his life for the cause of justice and for satisfying what his people thought was right! Lord Ram always wanted that justice must be available to the poorest of the poor! He was not happy to see even a single person being unhappy in his kingdom
AS Marimuthu Vs The Ministry of Telecommunications slammed BSNL for virtually grabbing the property belonging to one AS Marimuthu without any compunction by paying a paltry sum of just Rupee one.
critical and comprehensive analysis of the case kapore chand vs. kadar unnisa begum
Pankaj Bansal v. State (Govt of NCT Delhi) that was pronounced as recently as on June 9, 2023 has decisively ruled that the discretion of an applicant
Top