Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Saturday, December 21, 2024

Franchise laws in India

Thu, May 3, 18, 12:24, 7 Years ago
star star star star star
5 out of 5 with 1 ratings
comments: 0 - hits: 7758
In commercial and business sense the word Franchise means a permission granted by a manufacturer to a distributor or retailer to sell its products within a specified territory

Franchising
In commercial and business sense the word "Franchise" means a permission granted by a manufacturer to a distributor or retailer to sell its products within a specified territory. A franchise can be equated with a licence. A franchise may include a contract whereby the owner of a business grants to another person permission to carryon a particular business using the grantor's know-how and trade mark as the grantee's own business. The grantor may exercise continuing control over the management of the grantee's business and give all possible support in carrying on the said business. This is done for a consideration agreed upon by the parties.

The grantor of such licence is in modern terminology called "Franchisor" and the grantee as "Franchisee". In some cases the Franchisee can carry on his existing business and take on the franchised business and both can be run at the same premises by the Franchisee. If required a Franchisee has to set up a factory and install plant and machinery to carry on the franchised business. By such franchise the Franchisor does not control his business but finds an additional outlet for sale of his products. The Franchise Agreement may require the Franchisee to deal exclusively with the franchised articles subject to any statute relating to Monopoly and Restrictive Trade Practices.

Franchising can be done within the same country by division of geographical area or Franchisor appointing the Franchisee in another country to expand its market share of the product.

Franchising can be in respect of an existing business or a new business.

Franchising agreement may be in respect of construction business, automobile parts and services, petroleum products, business aids and services, education services, soft drinks, fast foods, restaurants, health, medical, beauty care, commercial and other miscellaneous matters.

A Franchisor appoints a Franchisee to sell his products in a new geographical area in a new market to increase his sales and income. To capture markets in other countries franchising is one of the methods, the other method may be establishing a subsidiary company or a joint venture or a new company in collaboration with the Franchisee company. It is a pure commercial matter and profit motive is the main criteria for the Franchisor and the Franchisee.

The advantages of a Franchise Agreement is that the Franchisor expands markets of his products and earns more profit and the advantage of the Franchisee is that it deals with a product already having a goodwill and reputation on its own right and thereby expecting a good turnover and consequently substantial profit. The Franchisee gets almost an assured share of the market for the product and as such he runs less risk of operating loss or loss of capital that he may invest for the franchised goods.

The Franchisor to protect his own interest must see that the Franchisee does not act for another franchisor and proper accounts are maintained and royalties and other payments are made regularly to the Franchisor by the Franchisee for use of the franchised items including goodwill. The Franchisor to protect its interest may try to control and regulate to some extent the business of the Franchisee. The Franchisee to earn this extra income by using the goodwill of the Franchisor has to surrender a portion of his liberty and is to carry on his business in consultation with the Franchisor and make utmost efforts to pay royalties and fees in time. Franchisor has an advantage over ordinary distributorship inasmuch as in normal circumstances the owner of the goods do not have sufficient control over the distributor and the distributor may not have any shop or outlet except his own godown. For the purpose of business profits and development a Franchising Agreement is more beneficial for both the manufacturer and the seller.

Before entering into the Franchising Agreement the Franchisee must satisfy himself that the Franchisor has in fact a goodwill and that his goods will be sold at a profit without much efforts. The Franchisor would see that the Franchisee has enough capital to invest and has a good set up to carry on the business of the franchised goods efficiently and profitably, the capital adequacy of the Franchisee and the know-how about the business or matter to be franchised. The Franchisee may be given some training so that he may make himself fully acquainted with the product of the Franchisor and become competent to deal with the customers and give satisfactory services to them. The Franchisor after giving the franchise will pass on the up-to-date technology to the Franchisee so that the products and services of the Franchisor may stand the competition of the market.

The Franchisor is to make sure that he will get payment by way of royalties and/or fees for the goods, services and/or technology transferred to enable the Franchisee to carryon the business in the franchised goods or services. The Franchisor may demand a lump sum payment in the beginning and thereafter royalties on the sale proceeds or on any other basis depending upon the nature of the transaction. If the Franchisee has no funds the Franchisor may help the Franchisee in raising loans from the Financial Institutions or by issue of shares. The Franchisor may take shares in lieu of lump sum, royalty and services thereby to some extent solving the cash flow difficulty of the Franchisee.

So long the parties are reasonably honest the Franchising Agreement will remain effective and both parties would gain but if one of the parties try to deprive the other of his legitimate dues the Agreement would fail and both will suffer. Therefore good faith and honesty of purpose will be essential in such an arrangement.

The requirement of capital in the business of Franchisee and the 'extent of control by the Franchisor over the business will depend upon the nature of the subject matter of the franchise. The Franchisor has to supervise to some extent the working of the Franchisee's business and to see that the Franchising Agreement works to the advantage of both the Franchisor and the Franchisee. Unless it is profitable for both the parties the agreement cannot work. There must be also provisions making it difficult for either party to deprive the other of his legitimate dues and/or expectations.

Before entering into the agreement both the Franchisor and the Franchisee should obtain all required information in respect of each other and consider whether in the particular type of business the arrangements would work profitably for both the parties.

The Franchise Agreement may contain all possible safeguards to avoid any misunderstanding at a later date. Both parties must see that the franchising business develops and remains prosperous. Unless the business is running well the Franchisee will not be able to pay the royalties or service charges and the Franchisor will not be able to recover its dues by way of royalties and service charges. Any litigation will damage the image of both the parties. A businessman will be reluctant to enter into any agreement with a Franchisor or a Franchisee who was involved in litigation in respect of its business transaction.

The quantum of lump sum initial payment, the rate of royalty and other payments to be made by the Franchisee are to be calculated taking into consideration the probable turnover in the business of the Franchisee, his capital structure, his access to market, his management efficiency as also capacity. In other words the financial solvency, technical ability, a fund of goodwill and good faith are required from both the parties to make the Franchise Agreement a success.

For foreign investment in India Reserve Bank of India permission will be required. Foreign companies and Nationals will require prior permission of RBI to carry on in India any activity of a trading, commercial or industrial nature or to set up a project or an office or a place of business for carrying activity. For the purpose of execution of any specific project or contract if the foreigner wants to obtain a temporary office then prior permission of RBI will be required. Foreign Franchisor intending to set up once in India or to post a representative for liaison activity will require prior permission of RBI.

A foreign national or company with the permission of RBI may accept an appointment as an agent in India of a foreign Principal in his trading or commercial transaction. If the foreigner takes up employment in India or acts as an Advisor in India on non-repatriable basis then RBI permission will not be necessary.

Franchise Agreement that provides professional, technical, accountancy or consultancy services being a self-financing unit within India will require RBI approval if any remittance to foreign country is involved.
If a technician of a foreign Franchisor is on a short visit to train or supervise the staff or operation of the Franchisee, the Franchisee can pay for the air fare and expenses in India of the foreign technician in Indian rupees. General permission of RBI is required to import or export Indian Currency.

Permission of RBI is necessary for giving a Guarantee in respect of debts, obligations or liabilities in favour of a person resident outside India. A Franchisee for opening a Performance Guarantee or for issuing a Letter of Credit in favour of the foreign Franchisor will have to obtain prior permission of RBI.

A Franchisee who seeks to obtain technical know-how must obtain the approval of RBI, for technical know-how or the collaboration agreement with the foreign Franchisor, the Franchisee has to obtain RBI permission for lump sum payment, remittance for royalty or technical fees. In approving such agreement RBI designates the branch of the authorized dealer preferably a Bank through whom remittances of the fees and royalty are to be made. In granting such permission RBI may modify the agreement in relation to payment. The authorized bank is under obligation to strictly follow RBI terms and conditions of remittances and of the Franchise agreement. The bank is required to maintain separate records for remittances under the Franchise Agreement till 5 years after termination of the agreement.

The Franchisee has to submit a return by 15th of January every year showing payments made under the agreement during the proceeding year. The Franchisee gives a guarantee to the Income Tax Authorities on behalf of the foreign Franchisor for payment of tax or to deduct tax at source at the applicable rates and deposit the same to the account of Income Tax Authorities. A No Objection Certificate or tax clearance certificate is required from the Income Tax Authorities before any remittance can be made to the foreign Franchisor.

A Franchisee may engage the services of a foreign national on a short term assignment not exceeding 3 months at a time without the approval of RBI. All payments made in connection with the foreign personnel including payments made locally in rupee towards their travel, living expenses, etc. are liable to a cess at 5% under the Research and Development Cess Act 1996. For employment of a foreign national for technical assistance for more than 3 months Home Ministry's permission has to be obtained. Foreign nationals who are in regular employment with a Franchisee on monthly salary are permitted to make recurring remittances for family maintenance up to 75% of net salary after deduction of Provident Fund contribution and Indian Income Tax. A Franchisor having a branch in India has to obtain permission from RBI for remittance of profits.

Dividend, interest and other income on shares and securities and sale proceeds thereof originally acquired out of the remittance in foreign exchange may be repatriated after obtaining permission of RBI subject to deduction of Indian Income Tax. A Franchisee intending to remit dividends to its non­ resident shareholders has to obtain permission of RBI.

In respect of foreign investments in about 22 Consumer Goods Industries, RBI has stipulated remittance of dividend on a balancing system rendering thereby that the amount of foreign exchange outflow by way of dividend should be balanced with similar amount of inflow of foreign exchange by way of export earnings.

A foreign Franchisor or a foreigner requiring permission of RBI to acquire, hold, transfer or dispose of by sale, mortgage, lease, gift, settlement or otherwise any immovable property in India excepting a lease not exceeding 5 years has to apply to Central Office of RBI, Foreign Investment Department in Mumbai.

By a notification dated 26th April 1993 RBI has granted general permission to foreign companies to acquire or hold any immovable property which is necessary for or incidental to any activity permitted by the RBI. On obtaining such permission the company has to submit a declaration to RBI within 90 days of such acquisition.

Foreign citizens, foreign companies, foreign trusts, societies and associations will be permitted to acquire immovable property by RBI provided the immovable property is acquired for consideration and is paid out of the foreign exchange remitted from abroad in convertible currency through normal banking channel and any income or proceeds of the property are to be credited only to the non-resident Rupee account and will not be allowed to be repatriated.

By a notification of 26th May 1993 RBI has granted permission to the foreign citizens of Indian origin who are resident in India or not to acquire or dispose of immovable property other than agricultural land, farm house and plantation property subject to fulfillment of certain conditions.

Foreign Franchisor cannot acquire any business in India as of right. The right of a foreign Franchisor under any Franchise Agreement will be subject to permission of RBI. RBI permission is necessary for acquiring the whole or part of any industry in India in trade and industry.

Provisions should be made to resolve the disputes between the Franchisor and the Franchisee in relation to their transactions. Both parties must consider whether arbitration in a foreign country would be feasible both from economic point of view and conducting proceeding in a foreign country involving huge foreign exchange. Provisions may be made to buyout the business of one party by the other in respect of which Franchise Agreement was entered into in the event of any such dispute.

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
admin
Member since Feb 20, 2018
Location: India
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
The Sanskrit saying Atithi Devo Bhava means- the one who comes to you for being served, should be taken to be as God, is considered as the highest order of responsibility,
The owner. of a land with a view to get construction made of a multistoried building on the land may invite tenders from one or more contractors.
Money Laundering is a method of legitimizing the illegally earned money so as to avoid being caught while carrying on illegal activities and avoid taxes. It involves three stages.
The inclination towards working together to do business and attain other commercial objectives has a long history. Partnership and companies has been the main mechanisms to achieve these goals.
Registrars of Companies (ROC) appointed under Section 609 of the Companies Act covering the various States and Union Territories, are vested with the primary duty of registering companies
Imposed a cost of Rs 50,000 on Vibgyor Texotech Ltd for filing multiple proceedings before different forums on similar grounds, thereby, abusing the process of law.
Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd case struck down the controversial circular issued by the RBI, directing banks to initiate insolvency proceedings against companies having bad debts of Rs 2000 crores or above.
The legal process outsourcing business is stretching across boundaries due to upgraded technology and seamless communication channels. The internet and universal acceptance of English language have made it possible. Besides, there are cost, time and efficiency benefits that amplify for its requirement.
There had been several instances of economic offenders fleeing the Jurisdiction of Indian courts anticipating the commencement of criminal proceedings or sometimes during the pendency of such proceedings.
One Stop destination for Publication in Online law Certificate Courses, Books and high quality Indian Journal of law on research and Online legal Courses subjects
an LLP is an alternate corporate buisness
A brawny banking sector is essential for a proliferate economy. In 2007, Where the United State and other Western Countries were facing the banking crisis and related global financial crisis, but the Indian economy was not affected
The E-Commerce (Regulation) Bill, 2019 is for protection of rights of consumers against marketing of products and services through e-commerce and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
The non-residents of India have a great option of investing in dividend mutual funds for perpetual income. This investment alternative credits undisturbed income in their account. If there seems any delay upon the declaration of the profit of the underlying company, the financial institution provides interest on.
Shailendra Swarup vs The Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate that the liability to be proceeded with for offence under Section 68 of the FERA, 1973 depends on the role one plays in the affairs of the company and not on mere designation or status.
Abhishek Kumar Singh v/s Himachal Pradesh that even accused has a right to live with dignity. It also made it very clear that begging or pestering before someone to stand as a surety comes at the cost of pride and so the Courts while granting bail should give a choice to the accused to either furnish surety bonds or give a cash deposit.
Dilip Singh vs Madhya Pradesh a criminal court exercising jurisdiction to grant bail/anticipatory bail, it is not expected to act as a recovery agent to realize the dues of the complainant
Mr Vassudev Madkaikar vs. Goa the Goa State Cooperative Bank Ltd. is not a 'State' nor does it fall within the ambit of 'any other authority' for the purposes of Article 12.
This paper looks at the roles, duties and rights of a RP in insolvency proceedings in brief.
Drafting a legal documents needs a guide to improve for bringing comprehensibility and readability, which includes careful editing & organized structure etc..
This article delves into the essar steel judgement of 2019 to analyse how the court gave a decision based on business logic and legal analysis of how the role of the commitee of creditors is most important and must be upheld. The court gave a clear analysis of how equity and equality is different when it comes creditors.
The confusion regarding whether an acceptance can be done on mere silence basis is unclear under the Indian contract law. Therefore, it is subjected to deliberation which the research will try to further pertain on.
Contract of indemnity may sound very similar to a contract of insurance to a layman and therefore allows for anomalies in perception, resulting in confusion, which the study will attempt to expand on.
Telangana High Court has issued practice directions to Magistrates and Trial Courts having jurisdiction to try offences under the Negotiable Instruments Act pursuant to the directions issued by the Supreme Court
Sarvesh Bisaria vs Anand Nirog Dham Hospital Pvt Ltd that if the Metropolitan Magistrate takes cognizance of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, it is not that a decree against the respondent defendant will follow automatically.
Secretarial Audit and Secretarial Compliance Certificate form an integral part of Companies (Amendment) Act of 2020. This article is an attempt to give an overview of the same.
This Article analysis a companies situation pre and post merger deals. It discusses whether or not mergers and acquisitions create sustainable value for shareholders.
Sripati Singh (D) Through His Son Gaurav Singh vs Jharkhand that the dishonour of cheque issued as a security can also attract offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Dr Subramanium Swamy vs UOI that the bidding process for disinvestment of then national airline, Air India, was not rigged in favour of the Tata Group.
Pradeep Kumar v/s Post Master General that once it is established that fraud or any wrongful act was perpetrated by an employee of a post office during the course of their employment, the post office would be vicariously liable for the wrongful act of such employee.
Mohammad Usman vs UP that sentencing is just a way to recover the arrears and is not a mode to discharge the liability. In this case, the OP2 wife had filed an application under Section 125 CrPC and an ex parte order was granted in her favour
Gopala Krishna Mootha vs NCT of Delhi before making a person vicariously liable for offences committed by a company under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Ibrat Faizan vs Omaxe Buildhome Private Limited that an order passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in appeal under Section 58(1)(a)(iii) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 can be challenged in a writ petition filed before a High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution.
HDFC Bank Ltd Mawlai Nonglum Branch v Sri Baklai Siej that for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act to be made out, the dishonoured cheque must have been issued by the account holder under his name and signature.
State Bank of India Anantnag Vs GM Jamsheed Dar that there is no need to obtain the previous sanction to prosecute bank officials in connection with offences under IPC/RPC.
Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC v Competition Commission of India has decisively upheld the order passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) whereby Amazon was directed to pay Rs 200 crores penalty under Section 43A of the Competition Act, 2002.
The termination of the agreement by Vishakhapatnam Port Authority shall not be treated as disqualification of Adani Port to participate in future tenders floated by public bodies.
Tabasum Mir Vs Union of India that money stashed abroad by evading tax could be used in ways which could threaten national security.
Bank of India vs Magnifico Minerals Private Limited that nationalized banks should be made conscious of the fact that their negligence causes a great deal of loss to the public.
A Nidhi company has to inform more about its disclosers and changes in its control through mergers or acquisitions.
Upon startup registration, the biggest challenge is to avail seed funding. It’s an investment by angel investors, venture capitalists, and government agencies to support new companies with funds. It is availed at the time of ideation and initialization of this company.
Yogesh Upadhyay vs Atlanta Limited that: Notwithstanding the non obstante clause in Section 142(1) of the NI Act, the power of this Court to transfer criminal cases under Section 406 Cr.P.C.
Starting a new business requires a lot of hard work, dedication, and perseverance. Entrepreneurs must be prepared to face these challenges head-on and work to overcome them in order to build a successful business.
Reema Arora v/s Department of Agriculture The Court quashed the criminal complaint that was filed under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955
Yusuf Malik vs UOI that the Supreme Court while taking potshots at the UP Government’s decision termed it as shocking and unsustainable the invocation of NSA in a revenue recovery case which was totally uncalled for.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SECTOR REGULATORS AND COMPETITION LAW
The stock market is part of the financial market where money is collected from surplus unit and lend to deficit unit.Here lenders are the investors and borrowers are the government and the companies. Companies uses securities to raise capital in public and private markets. Securities can be classified into two types : (a)Equity (b)Debt
Bloomberg Television Production Services India Private Limited and others vs Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited urged the Trial Courts to be cautious while granting pre-trial injunctions against the publication of media articles and journalistic pieces in defamation suits.
The FTAs between UK-India and EU-India may allow India integrate with the global value chain of trade which is dominant, and the UK and the EU may find themselves accessing the single largest and fast-growing market along with one of the foremost manufacturing hubs
Top