Legal Services India - Law Articles is a Treasure House of Legal Knowledge and information, the law resources is an ever growing database of authentic legal information.
Legal Services India

» Home
Saturday, December 21, 2024

The Surrogacy Bill, 2016

Posted in: Civil Laws
Fri, Dec 28, 18, 17:22, 6 Years ago
star star star star star
4 out of 5 with 6 ratings
comments: 1 - hits: 8884
This article deals with importance, needs, highlights and provisions of the Surrogacy Bill 2016, which is passed by the lok sabha on 19th December 2018 .

The Surrogacy (regulation) bill, 2016 was introduced in Lok Sabha on 21st November, 2016 and on 12th January, 2017 it was referred to standing committee. Thereafter on 10th August 2017 the committee gave its report on the same to Lok Sabha and on the basis of that report Lok Sabha passed the bill on 19th December 2018.

The Surrogacy bill, 2016 focuses on prevention of commercial surrogacy and promotion of altruistic surrogacy. The bill also safeguards the surrogate mother and child from exploitation. Surrogacy is a way by which an infertile married couple who are eligible in accordance with the provisions of the bill can now bear a child with help of a surrogate mother eligible as per provisions of the bill. However the surrogate mother will not be given any monetary benefit or compensation for renting her womb to intended couple except her medical and insurance expenses during pregnancy.

The proposed legislation provides for registration of surrogacy clinic and establishment of National and State surrogacy board and Appropriate Authority.

Need for Surrogacy bill
In India there was no prescribed legislation to regulate the practice of surrogacy. There were some guidelines issued by THE COUNCIL of MEDICAL RESEARCH in the year 2005, to regulate surrogacy in India[1]. These guidelines were contrary to the present bill in the sense that the guidelines provided for monetary compensation to the surrogate mother which is to be decided by the intending couple and the surrogate mother.

In 2008, in the case of Baby Manji Yamada vs. Union of India[2], Supreme Court of India realised the lack of legislation relating to surrogacy in India. India was facing issues because of the lack of surrogacy legislation as India was becoming a hub for commercial surrogacy. In 2009 it was observed by Law Commission of India that Foreign Nationals were attracted because surrogate mother were available at lower charges due to poverty which led to exploitation of poor women.[3]

Thereafter the law commission of India praised enactment of a surrogate bill that forbids commercial surrogacy and approves altruistic surrogacy, provides provisions for regulation of surrogacy.

The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016 [4]passed by Lok Sabha provides for the following:
The bill defines under Section 2:
(b) Altruistic surrogacy “altruistic surrogacy" means the surrogacy in which no charges, expenses, fees, remuneration or monetary incentive of whatever nature, except the medical expenses incurred on surrogate mother and the insurance coverage for the surrogate mother, are given to the surrogate mother or her dependents or her representative

(f) Commercial surrogacy “commercial surrogacy" means commercialisation of surrogacy services or procedures or its component services or component procedures including selling or buying of human embryo or trading in the sale or purchase of human embryo or gametes or selling or buying or trading the services of surrogate motherhood by way of giving payment, reward, benefit, fees, remuneration or monetary incentive in cash or kind, to the surrogate mother or her dependents or her representative, except the medical expenses incurred on the surrogate mother and the insurance coverage for the surrogate mother;

(g) Couple as legally married Indian man and woman above the age of 21 years and 18 years respectively married Man and Woman.
(zb) “Surrogacy" means a practice whereby one woman bears and gives birth to a child for an intending couple with the intention of handing over such child to the intending couple after the birth;

However there is no definition of the word close relative in the Act.

Section 3 of the Act provides for:
1) Compulsory Registration of Surrogacy Clinic,
2) No surrogacy at other place than registered clinic, no Specialist or medical practitioner shall perform commercial surrogacy
3) No Specialist or medical practitioner to perform without qualification
4) No promotion or aid or advertisement
* of commercial surrogacy in any way by clinic or any person
* That encourage a women to be a surrogate mother
* Seeks a women to Act as a surrogate
* Implies the willingness of a women to become a surrogate 
5) No abortion without consent of mother and Appropriate Authority (such authorisation should comply with the provisions of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971)
6) NO storage of Human Embryo or Gamete is allowed for surrogacy purpose.


 

Regulation of Surrogacy And Surrogacy Procedures

Section 4- Under following purposes surrogacy is permitted- Infertile, Altruistic (Unselfish) purpose, No commercial surrogacy, No prostitution or sale of born surrogate child, for any other purpose or disease for which regulation made by Board allows.
Clause 3 Director or In-charge of clinic and specialist of clinic are satisfied that following Conditions are fulfilled -
 Certificate is issued by competent Authority after confirming the below conditions-
1) Certificate of infertility to the couple intending surrogacy by District Medical Board,
2) Order of Court passed by a Magistrate of the first class or above, regarding custody and parentage of child,
3) Insurance of Surrogate mother and child.

Eligibility certificate of surrogate mother by Appropriate Authority -
1) Ever married woman having own child (25-35 age).
2) Close relative (Not defined in this Act)
3) One surrogate birth in her life time (no limit for attempts)
4) Medical and psychological Fitness certificate of intending surrogate mother.

Eligibility of Intending couple Appropriate Authority -
1) Age women 23 to 50 man 26 to 55,
2) 5 years of marriage,
3) Indian citizen,
4) No child before by any way (exception- child having life threatening disease or disorder with no cure with certificate of district medical Board)

Section 6 Written consent of surrogate mother is necessary and she shall be told all the side effects of the birth.
Section 7 No child shall be abandoned (Defined under Section 2(a) of the Act) by the intending parents after birth for any reason or defect or gender. (Child born by surrogacy shall be deemed to be a natural child)
Section 9 No person shall in any way force the surrogate mother to abort the child.
 

Registration of Surrogacy Clinic

Section 10 Application for registration shall be made by clinic to competent Authority in prescribed form and with fee within 60 days of establishment of Authority and if not applied for registered such clinic shall cease to be a clinic within 6 months from the commencement of the Act. No registration shall be granted till Authority is satisfied that clinic has the required manpower and facilities.

Section 11- Authority shall grant Certificate on being satisfied of all conditions within 90 days of application. Authority shall reject Certificate with reason recorded in writing. Certificate will be valid till 3years and it can be renewed. Clinic shall display the certificate at noticeable place.

Section 12- Cancellation or suspension of certificate may be done by Authority either on suo moto or on complaint for breach of any provision of the Act after giving notice to clinic to show cause why the certificate shall not be cancelled. After hearing the clinic it may cancel or suspend the certificate. Authority may also suspend or cancel certificate without notice for public interest.

Section 13 Surrogate clinic aggrieved by order of Authority under Section 12 within 30 days from the date of order appeal to State Government (SG) or Central government (CG).

Section 14 to 22 - The Act provides for Constitution of National Surrogacy Board and prescribes the term of office of Members, Meeting of Board, Vacancies that occur should not invalidate the proceeding, disqualifications for appointment as member, Eligibility for reappointment of member.

Section 22- Functions of the National Surrogacy Board:-
# To advise Central Government on matters of surrogacy
# To review and monitor implementation of Act
# To Lay down code of conduct to be observed by persons at clinic and minimum standards of physical infrastructure, equipment’s of Clinic
# Observe performance of bodies constituted, supervise the functioning.

Section 23 to 31 - Constitution of State and Union surrogacy Board and prescribes for Composition, term of office of member, meetings of board, Vacancies that occur should not invalidate the proceeding, disqualifications for appointment as member, Eligibility for reappointment of member

Section 32- Appointment of appropriate Authority within 90 days from the date of commencement of this act by Central Government as well as State Government.

Section 33 - Functions of Appropriate Authority:-
1) Grant, suspend or cancel registration of surrogacy clinic
2) To enforce standards to be maintained by clinic
3) To investigate complaint of breach of provision of the Act, take legal action
4) Take legal Action and investigate in the matter of use of surrogacy at any place other than prescribed.
5) Supervise implantation of Act
6) To recommend Board and State Boards about modifications in technology
7) Take appropriate Action after investigation of complaint received
8) To consider grant or reject any application.

Section 34- Powers of Appropriate Authority:-
# Summoning of any person violation provision of the Act,
# Production of document or material object,
# Search any place violation provision of the Act,
# Other power as may be prescribed.

Section 34 (2) - Shall maintain a record in register of grant, cancel, suspend of certificate, certificate to intending couple and surrogate mother.
 

Offences and Punishment Mentioned Under The Act

Section 35 Prohibition of commercial surrogacy and exploitation of surrogate mother, child born.
# No person or group shall undertake commercial surrogacy or provide any relating service.
# No advertisement or publication for commercial surrogacy
# No person shall disown abandon exploit in any form the child
# No person shall exploit the surrogate mother
# No person shall sell human embryo or gamete for surrogacy
# No person shall import or help in import of human embryo or gamete for surrogacy

Above mentioned Acts are punishable with Imprisonment of not less than 10 years and fine may extend up to 10 lakh.

Section 36 Punishment for contravention of any provisions of the Act- Imprisonment of not less than 5 years and fine may extend up to 10 lakh.

Section 37 Punishment for initiation of commercial surrogacy- Any person who seeks commercial surrogacy shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than five years and with fine which may extend to five lakh rupees for the first offence and for any subsequent offence with imprisonment which may extend to ten years and with fine which may extend to ten lakh rupees.

Section 38 Penalty for Contravention of provisions of Act or rules for which no specific punishment is provided shall be punishable with 3 years + 5 lakhs continuing contravention 10,000 for every day.

“Section 39 Presumption in case of surrogacy
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the Court shall presume, unless the contrary is proved, that the woman or surrogate mother was compelled by her husband, the intending couple or any other relative, as the case may be, to render surrogacy services, procedures or to donate gametes for the purpose other than those specified in clause (ii) of Section 4 and such person shall be liable for abetment of such offence under Section 37 and shall be punishable for the offence specified under that Section.”

The Bill is yet to be introduced in Rajya Sabha and after the accent of president the bill will become an Act. 

End-Notes
[1] National Guidelines for Accreditation, Supervision & Regulation of ART Clinics in India, Indian Council of Medical Research, 2005
[2]  (2008) 13 SCC 518
[3] Need for Legislation to Regulate Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinics as well as Rights and Obligations of Parties to a Surrogacy, Report No. 228, Law Commission, 2009,http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/report228.pdf.
[4] https://www.prsindia.org/sites/default/files/bill_files/Surrogacy%20%28Regulation%29%20Bill%2C%202016.pdf
[5] The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016 Passed by Lok Sabha

Legal Services India

Comments

There are no comments for this article.
Only authorized users can leave comments. Please sign in first, or register a free account.
Share
Sponsor
About Author
Simran Mehta
Member since Dec 28, 2018
Location: n/a
Following
User not following anyone yet.
You might also like
Present space law framework in the country. Space has heightened the curiosity of mankind for centuries. Due to the advancement in technology, there is fierce competition amongst nations for the next space war.
The scope of Section 151 CPC has been explained by the Supreme Court in the case K.K. Velusamy v. N. Palanisamy
Co-operative Societies are governed by the Central Co-operative Societies Act 1912, where there is no State Act. In West Bengal they were governed by the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act
Registration enables an NGO to be a transparent in its operations to the Government, Donors, to its members and to its urgent community.
The ingredients of Section 18 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 are
Drafting of legal Agreements and Deeds in India
ST Land rules in India,West Bengal
The paper will discuss about the provisions related to liquidated damages. How the law has evolved. Difference between the provisions of England and India.
A privilege may not be a right, but, under the constitution of the country, I do not gather that any broad distinction is drawn between the rights and the privileges that were enjoyed and that were taken away.
It is most hurting to see that in India, the soldiers who hail from Jammu and Kashmir and who join forces either in Army or in CRPF or in BSF or in police or in any other forces against the will of majority
Pukhraj v/s State of Uttarakhand warned high caste priests very strongly against refusing to perform religious ceremonies on behalf of lower caste pilgrims. It took a very stern view of the still existing practice of exclusion of the SC/ST community in Haridwar.
This article aims to define delay in civil suits. It finds the general as well as specific causes leading to pendency of civil suits and over-burdening of courts. This articles suggests some solutions which are pragmatic as well as effective to reduce the burden of the courts and speed up the civil judicial process.
Cross Examination In Case of Injunction Suits, Injunctions are governed by Sections 37, 38, 39 to Section 42 of Specific Relief Act.
Satishchandra Ratanlal Shah v Gujarat inability of a person to return the loan amount cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction..
Dr.Ashok Khemka V/s Haryana upheld the integrity of eminent IAS officer because of his upright and impeccable credentials has emerged as an eyesore for politicians of all hues but also very rightly expunged Haryana Chief Minister ML Khattar adverse remarks in his Personal Appraisal Report
State of Rajasthan and others v. Mukesh Sharma has upheld the constitutional validity of Rule 8(2)(i) of the Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 2006.
Gurmit Singh Bhatia Vs Kiran Kant Robinson the Supreme Court reiterated that, in a suit, the plaintiff is the dominus litis and cannot be forced to add parties against whom he does not want to fight unless there is a compulsion of the rule of law.
explicitly in a latest landmark ruling prohibited the use of loudspeakers in the territory without prior permission from the authorities.
The Commissioner of Police v/s Devender Anand held that filing of criminal complaint for settling a dispute of civil nature is abuse of process of law.
Rajasthan Vs Shiv Dayal High Court cannot dismiss a second appeal merely on the ground that there is a concurrent finding of two Courts (whether of dismissal or decreeing of the suit), and thus such finding becomes unassailable.
Complete Guide to Pleadings in India, get your Written statement and Plaint Drafted by highly qualified lawyers at reasonable rate.
Sushil Chandra Srivastava vs UP imposed absolute prohibition on use of DJs in the state and asked the state government to issue a toll-free number, dedicated to registering complaints against illegal use of loudspeakers. It will help control noise pollution to a very large extent if implemented in totality.
Rajasthan v/s Shri Ramesh Chandra Mundra that institutional independence, financial autonomy is integral to independence of judiciary. directing the Rajasthan Government to reconsider the two decade old proposal of the then Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court to upgrade 16 posts of its Private Secretaries as Senior Private Secretaries
The Indian Contract act, 1872 necessities significant consideration in a few of its areas. One such area of the Indian Contract act of 1872 is where if any person finds a lost good belonging to others and takes them into his custody acts as the bailee to the owner of the good.
Government has notified 63 provisions of the Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019 including the ones dealing with enhanced penalties
Jose Paulo Coutinho vs. Maria Luiza Valentina Pereira no attempt has been made yet to frame a Uniform Civil Code applicable to all citizens of the country despite exhortations by it. Whether succession to the property of a Goan situated outside Goa in India will be governed by the Portuguese Civil Code, 1867
In a major legal setback to Pakistan, the High Court of England and Wales rejecting rightly Pakistan's frivolous claims and ruling explicitly that the VII Nizam of Hyderabad's descendants and India can collect 35 million pounds from Londons National Westminster Bank.
Power of Attorney and the Specific Relief Act, 1963
air pollution in Delhi and even adjoining regions like several districts of West UP are crossing all limits and this year even in districts adjoining Delhi like Meerut where air pollution was never felt so much as is now being felt.
Dr Syed Afzal (Dead) v/sRubina Syed Faizuddin that the Civil Courts while considering the application seeking interim mandatory injunction in long pending cases, should grant opportunity of hearing to the opposite side, interim mandatory injunctions can be granted after granting opportunity of hearing to the opposite side.
students of Banaras Hindu University's (BHU's) Sanskrit Vedvigyan Sankay (SVDVS) went on strike demanding the cancellation of the appointment of Assistant Professor Feroze Khan and transfer him to another faculty.
Odisha Development Corporation Ltd Vs. M/s Anupam Traders & Anr. the time tested maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit which in simple and straight language means that, No party should suffer due to the act of Court.
M/S Daffodills Pharmaceuticals Ltd v/s. State of U.P that no one can be inflicted with an adverse order, without being afforded a minimum opportunity of hearing. In other words, the Apex Court reiterated the supreme importance of the legal maxim and latin phrase titled Audi alteram partem
Ram Murti Yadav v/s State of Uttar Pradesh the standard or yardstick for judging the conduct of the judicial officer has necessarily to be strict, that the public has a right to demand virtually irreproachable conduct from anyone performing a judicial function.
Judicial Officers Being Made Scapegoats And Penalized By Inconvenient Transfers And Otherwise: SC
Desh Raj v/s Balkishan that the mandatory time-line for filing written statement is not applicable to non-commercial suits. In non-commercial suits, the time-line for written statement is directory and not mandatory, the courts have the discretion to condone delay in filing of written statement in non-commercial suits.
M/S Granules India Ltd. Vs UOI State, as a litigant, cannot behave as a private litigant, and it has solemn and constitutional duty to assist the court in dispensation of justice.
To exercise one's own fundamental right to protest peacefully does not give anyone the unfettered right to block road under any circumstances thereby causing maximum inconvenience to others.
Today, you have numerous traffic laws as well as cases of traffic violations. People know about safe driving yet they end up defying the safety guidelines. It could be anything like driving while talking on the phone, hit and run incidents, or driving under the influence of alcohol.
The legal processes are uncertain. Also, there are times when justice gets denied, and the legal outcomes get delayed. Hence, nobody wants to see themselves or their loved one end up in jail.
Arun Kumar Gupta v/s Jharkhand that judicial officer's integrity must be of a higher order and even a single aberration is not permitted. The law pertaining to the vital subject of compulsory retirement of judicial officers have thus been summed up in this noteworthy judgment.
Online Contracts or Digital Agreements are contracts created and signed over the internet. Also known as e-contracts or electronic contracts, these contracts are a more convenient and faster way of creating and signing contracts for individuals, institutions and corporate.
Re: Problems And Miseries Of Migrant Labourers has asked Maharashtra to be more vigilant and make concerted effort in identifying and sending stranded migrant workers to their native places.
Gerald Lynn Bostock v/s Clayton County, Georgia that employees cannot be fired from the jobs merely because of their transgender and homosexual identity.
This article compares two cases with similar facts, yet different outcomes and examines the reasons for the same. It revolves around consideration and validation of contracts.
Odisha Vikas Parishad vs Union Of India while modifying the absolute stay on conducting the Jagannath Rath Yatra at Puri has allowed it observing the strict restrictions and regulations of the Centre and the State Government.
Soni Beniwal v/s Uttarakhand even if there is a bar on certain matters to be taken as PIL, there is always discretion available with the Court to do so in exercise of its inherent powers.
Indian Contract Act was commenced in the year 1872 and since then, several deductions and additions have happened to the same. The following piece of work discusses about the concept of offer under the Indian Contract Act, 1872
Top