Home       Top Rated       Submit Article     Advanced Search     FAQ       Contact Us     RSS Feeds     

Main Categories
 Case Laws
 Civil Laws
 Company Law
 Constitutional Law
 Consumer laws
 Criminal law
 Dubai laws
 Environmental Law
 family law
 Human Rights laws
 Immigration laws
 Intellectual Property
 Law - lawyers & legal Profession
 Miscellaneous
 SEO
 Tax Laws
 Woman Issues
 Workplace Equality & Non-Discrimination
 Yet Another Category

More Options
 Most read articles
 Most rated articles

Subscription
Subscribe now and receive free articles and updates instantly.

Name
Email



Copyright Registration
To Copyright Your Books, Videos, Songs, Scripts etc
Call us at: 9891244487 / or email at: admin@legalserviceindia.com

 
Top Law Colleges Click here

Law Law Updates:
Income-Tax
Family law
Company Law
Constitutional Law
Partnership firms
Immigration Law
Cyber Law
Lok Adalat, legal Aid & PIL
Forms:
Trademarks
Woman issues
Medico Legal
Consumer laws
Criminal laws
Supreme Court Judgments


Published : December 28, 2010 | Author : adoksh
Category : Miscellaneous | Total Views : 1791 | Rating :

  
adoksh
Adoksh Shastry
 

Government of India Act of 1915- Consolidating Statutes.

Primarily focused at the establishment of High Courts which was in boom during this period: The Government of India Act 1915, re-instated the provisions provided for in the Indian High Courts Act of 1861 and 1911.

By virtue of the powers conferred by Section 113 of the Government of India Act, 1915, the Crown by Letters Patent dated March 20, 1919 had established at Lahore, the High Court of judicature for the provinces of Punjab and Delhi to be called 'the High Court of judicature at Lahore'. The High Court of judicature at Lahore was a court of record.

The Government of India Act of 1915 bought about one firm reform and this was with regards to the jurisdiction of the High Courts. It was held in this act that no High Court could exert original jurisdiction over matters concerning---Revenue, or any act done concerning or relation to it.

The act of 1861 had not provided for such provisions and it is unclear as to why it was re-instated.

This author believes here that by taking revenue collection out of the original jurisdiction of these courts the British in India could enforce stronger and harsher revenue collection tactics without actually having to be questioned.

The mystery lies in why the courts were allowed appellate jurisdiction of such matters but not original.

The act also re-instated provisions provided for in the Regulating Act of 1773, and the Act of Settlement 1781. Under these provision's the Governor-general, Governor, lieutenant-governor, Chief Commissioner; members of the executive Council of the Governor-general, Governor or lieutenant-governor, and a minister would be exempt.

Thus we see a clear attempt on part of the British to again escape the liability of these courts, And set up a ground of difference between themselves and the Indians. This further justifies the writer's belief as to the re-incarnation of the Revenue Collection changes being in connection to escape of liability for British Subjects.

Further privileges seemed to don upon the British Subjects as now the Chief Justices and other judges were also exempt from being held liable in the High Court. Surely, a clear indication as to the direction they were heading towards. The principle of natural justice was clearly being flouted in their path towards establishing themselves as a strong power.

The customs and traditions and laws of the parties were to be applicable, if both parties up front the Presidency high Court, were from the same custom group. Thus we see that the British are now going back in time. Retrospective laws are being introduced. In a time where development for the future was the key, we see old laws being reinstated and progress being hindered.

Bibliography :
1.Outlines Of Indian Legal And Constitutional History ,Prof. M.P. Jain, Sixth Edition Reprint 2009,Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur,Chap 19,Pg 265
2.Kelth, op.cit. 249.
3. S.110 For analogous provisions in the Regulating act and Charter, see, Supra ,69,72
4. S. 112 consolidating Ss. 2, 3

Authors contact info - articles The  author can be reached at: adoksh@legalserviceindia.com




1 2 3 4 5
Rate this article!     Poor
Excellent    

Is 498A of the Indian Penal Code Anti-Social?

Affirmative Position : Yes 498A is Anti-Social because..... (100 Points)
          V/S
Negative Position : No 498A is NOT Anti-Social because..... (30 Points)

Post your argument
Click here

University of Athens - Faculty of Law
The Law School, which together with Theology, Medicine and Philosophy formed the core of the University of Athens, founded in 1837 during the reign of Otto....
Law Click here to see a list of Top law colleges in the world

We offer Copyright Registration Services
Right from your Desktop.....
click here



Most viewed articles in Miscellaneous category
Shops & Establishment Act of Punjab & Haryana
Role Of Election Commission
Indian Partnership Act,1932
Arbitral Award Its Challenge & Enforcement
Doctrine of Permissible Limits Under Delegated Legislation
Applying the Usurious Loans Act of India
Legislation & Common Law : Indian Legal System
Organ Transplantation-Legal,Social and Ethical issues
Joint & Several Liability
Child Labour in Indian Society
Development Of Laws Relating To Marine Insurance In India
Section.8(1)(j) of the RTI Act
Arbitration & Public International Law
Right to Innocent Passage in Territorial Sea.
A critique on the Right to Education Act.
Most recent articles in Miscellaneous category
Importance of hardship clauses in contract
Dumping & Anti Dumping Measures
Concept of unfair labour practice and the procedure for its redressal under M.R.T & P.U.L.P Act
The killing of Osama bin Laden was unlawful
Looking Back on Recession
Medical Negligence in India
Jurisdiction of Courts ought to be introduced under the RTI Act, 2005 for full compliance: An Analysis based on Analytical School of Jurisprudence
Tribal Laws & Customs in India
Government of the People, by the People, for the People
Mens Rea in Statutory Offences
Restrictive & Extensive Definitions – Critically Analysed
Section.8(1)(j) of the RTI Act
validity of foreign arbitral awards in India
Urgent Need of Privacy Laws In India
FDI Retail in India: A Critical View

Article Comments

there are no comments...

Post Your Comments
Name

Email

Your comments

Note : Your email address is only visible to admin, other members / users cannot see it.

You can use following FXCodes


BOLD : [b]
Italic : [i]

[b] LegalServicesIndia.com [/b] is a [i]nice website[/i].
[url= http://legalservicesindia.com/article/ ]click here to visit.[/url]

LegalServicesIndia.com is a nice website.
Click here to visit

 

Note : Currently, user comments are NOT moderated and will be posted immediately.



Welcome!
Please login or register a new free account.

Editor's Pick
It deals with the practical application of law of torts in sports

Statistics
» Total Articles
555
» Total Authors
1297
» Total Views
1391127
» Total categories
20

Lawyers Membership

Get Listed get Clients
Improve your Practice

Directory Listing

Blog - Exclusively law
Click here to start your Blog

Top 5 Blog Posts:
# Case laws defining Hindutva & Hinduism
# What Is Human Rights?
# liability of network service providers....
# Abortion laws
# Rights of Surrogate Mothers

TOP

Lawyers membership formLawyers Directory:
Delhi - Delhi-2 - Kolkata - Mumbai - Chennai - Bangalore - Hyderabad - Allahabad - Pune - Ahmedabad - Nagpur - Cochin
- Gurgaon - Jaipur - Ludhiana - Thane - Noida - Indore - Lucknow - Ghaziabad  Chandigarh - Jodhpur - Pondicherry - New York - Milan - Switzerland - Barbados - London - Cameroon - Dubai - Paris - Johannesburg -  Lawyers In America - Lawyers Home

Legal Advice
Consult Our legal Experts, all issues related Marriage, Divorce, Separation, Adoption, Wills etc - Get your solution within 48hrs - To avail Our professional service Click Here

Home | SC Judgments | Legal Forms | Advice | Add A Link | Terms of use | Debate | F A Q | Sitemap | About Us | Contact Us